Episode 1

full
Published on:

9th Jul 2021

Closing Arguments - Episode 1 (Fast/Speedy Trials and Forfeitures)

In the inaugural episode of Closing Arguments, we introduce you to John Razumich, Attorney at Razumich & Associates, P.C., who serves as an expert in criminal law and a public defender across the state of Indiana. After serving the greater Indiana area for over a decade, John brings a wealth of experience to the table.

After describing some of his personal and professional life experiences, John highlights the landscape surrounding fast and speedy trails. Not only has the definition of a fast and speedy trial evolved since its establishment, but there have been landmark court cases to help define this process.

Additionally, John will explore the idea of forfeitures and the misconceptions surrounding this topic.

So sit back, relax, and we thank you for joining us on our inaugural episode!

Timecodes:

0:07 - Welcome to the show and introducing John Razumich

2:13 - Background information on John and his law background in Indiana

5:04 - The reputation that Razumich & Associates receives across Indiana

6:39 - The hot topic of a fast and speedy trial

12:26 - Where the OJ Simpson case fell in the realm of fast and speedy trials

14:20 - The four-part balancing test applied to fast and speedy trials

24:00 - The Speedy Trial Act of 1974 and how it's applied to cases today

29:00 - How fast and speedy trials work throughout the state of Indiana

34:50 - An independent constitutional analysis and the Barker Test

42:15 - The case of Tyson Timbs and its impact on forfeitures

55:40 - But wait! There's more!

1:02:00 - Closing remarks


Connect with John Razumich:

Website

Facebook

YouTube

LinkedIn

Show artwork for Closing Arguments

About the Podcast

Closing Arguments
John Razumich is ready to fight for you!
Closing Arguments is a long-form legal podcast that explores the law beyond the headlines and the courtroom drama. Hosted by Indianapolis attorney Jack Razumich of Razumich & Associates, the show examines criminal law through real cases, legal history, and the human stories that shape the justice system.

Each episode dives deep into complex legal questions — from infamous and unusual lawsuits to landmark criminal cases and Indiana-specific legal issues — offering listeners thoughtful analysis, practical insight, and candid discussion grounded in real-world experience. Rather than soundbites or sensationalism, Closing Arguments focuses on the why, the how, and the consequences behind the law.

Whether unpacking bizarre cases like suing the Devil, examining legally haunted houses, or dissecting serious criminal matters that affect lives and communities, Closing Arguments invites listeners to think critically about justice, accountability, and the limits of the legal system.

This podcast is for anyone curious about how the law actually works — not in theory, but in practice.