Episode 6

Published on:

20th Mar 2024

The State of Indiana vs. Richard Allen (Part 4) - Analyzing the Original Actions

As we continue our coverage on the State of Indiana vs. Richard Allen case, we take a deeper look into the Original Actions existing within this case.

Original Actions themselves are quite rare to experience, but given the wild nature of this case it's no surprise we've experienced them.

Join us as Jack and Ryan break down the Original Actions, what they mean, and where this case is ultimately headed!


0:00 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day

2:40 - What is an Original Action and how it operates

4:09 - The limitations within Original Actions and how they are disfavored by the courts

7:21 - The two Original Actions filed within the Richard Allen case

13:47 - Why The Supreme Court denied the first writ

18:50 - The fireworks surrounding the Franks Motion filed in this case

26:42 - The Supreme Court granting the second Original Action, in part

33:51 - The case has reached a standstill for now

41:40 - Our plan for covering this case in the future as new developments arise

43:13 - Closing remarks

Connect with John Razumich:





Show artwork for Closing Arguments

About the Podcast

Closing Arguments
John Razumich is ready to fight for you!
Welcome to Closing Arguments, a show dedicated to exploring court cases and offering insights into the ever-changing landscape of criminal law.

Featuring John Razumich, Attorney at Razumich & Associates, P.C., each episode will highlight a new law-related topic to help provide education or guidance when navigating the complex world of criminal law. With over a decade of experience in criminal law throughout the state of Indiana, John is no stranger to a courtroom and is ready to fight for all his clients.

So sit back, relax, and enjoy thought-provoking conversations!