Episode 4

Published on:

4th Dec 2023

The State of Indiana vs. Richard Allen (Part 2) - Cracks in the State's Theory

If you thought this case was interesting, you haven't heard anything yet!

Welcome back to our multi-part episodic series, where we explore The State of Indiana vs. Richard Allen. This murder case has gained international attention and it continues to get crazier as time goes on.

In Part 2, we explore the pieces of evidence that begin creating cracks in the State's theory on how Richard Allen followed through with murder.



0:06 - Introduction and overview on the case

1:06 - Researching the case for the podcast has been exhausting

3:35 - What is a Franks Motion?

6:50 - The Defense attorneys argued that the Sheriff lied to the judge in application for warrant

7:50 - The State's public theory of the case

12:26 - The search warrant application containing false information

15:25 - Time to buckle up your seatbelt!

21:20 - The nature of the crime scene wasn't initially revealed

30:43 - There was no DNA left at the crime scene

34:57 - How Odinism comes into play with this case

39:18 - The red flags that begin popping up in the State's theory

49:14 - Who ultimately will be Richard Allen's attorney at the end of the day?

53:36 - Closing remarks

Connect with John Razumich:





Show artwork for Closing Arguments

About the Podcast

Closing Arguments
John Razumich is ready to fight for you!
Welcome to Closing Arguments, a show dedicated to exploring court cases and offering insights into the ever-changing landscape of criminal law.

Featuring John Razumich, Attorney at Razumich & Associates, P.C., each episode will highlight a new law-related topic to help provide education or guidance when navigating the complex world of criminal law. With over a decade of experience in criminal law throughout the state of Indiana, John is no stranger to a courtroom and is ready to fight for all his clients.

So sit back, relax, and enjoy thought-provoking conversations!